For my mini multimodal project, I
decided to experiment a bit with Dipity – a website that allows
users to create their own interactive timelines. I chose to do mine
on one of my favorite authors, Kurt Vonnegut Jr. For the timeline, I
didn't feel as though the images were that important. They simply
create an aesthetically pleasing visual to accompany the text and
make each point stand out on the timeline. That being said, I really
enjoyed making my interactive timeline although mine is only
half-complete as it is right now. Searching for information,
condensing that information, and placing it in the timeline was an
engaging activity. I like the visual aspect of the timeline as well. Users just click and drag and it is useful to see when each event takes place in relation to other events. I can see these timelines being extremely helpful
to students especially if they are used as review or as study guides
because the way they are setup is very clean, simplistic, and easy to
navigate. There are very few distracting, unnecessary details added
to these timelines – just the relevant facts in sequential order.
This is because the person setting up the timeline is forced to
restrict what they write in order to stay relevant to the timeframe
and heading that they create. The creator is specifically writing
about the most important, noteworthy points in the subject's life. I can see myself using interactive timelines in my own teachings for this very reason. They are a wonderful way to ensure the student is staying on track and focusing on the bigger, most important points. One of my criticisms though with the site is that the citing aspect of it isn't too great. You only provide a link to where you found your information; Dipity doesn't ask for authors, dates, or any other important citation information. That being said, having students provide a link to their source is a step in the right direction (assuming that they don't have any experience with sourcing).
When I think about the alternative, that is, just typing out a biography of Kurt Vonnegut Jr's life, the interactive timeline's appeal becomes all the more apparent. In order for students to learn, they need to be engaged; their interest must be piqued. Multimodal projects like the interactive timeline give students that extra level of engagement. Even if they are not creating their own timeline, simply viewing them is more engaging than, say, reading over one's notes or reading a biography.
Here is a link to my own timeline:
http://www.dipity.com/rosie1/The-Life-of-Kurt-Vonnegut-Jr/
The first half is a bit more complete
in terms of information given. If I were to further edit this, I
would write synopses for each novel that Kurt Vonnegut Jr. wrote as
well as write a bit more about his later life and what sort of jobs
and happenings occupied his time. That being said,
This interactive timeline is fantastic! You start out your blog post stating that images are not that important, however, your descriptions argue over and over for the aesthetic and engagement factors of images. And they add so much to your presentation of Vonnegut's life and your composing process. Both your timeline and process analysis in the blog post are very well done!
ReplyDelete